KSC utilizes approximately 2,000 individual
pieces of ground support lifting hardware that require annual load tests
(nondestructive stress tests performed by loading the hardware and monitoring
for deformation) in accordance with NASA documentation. This hardware includes
all general-purpose rigging such as synthetic web slings, wire-rope, alloy
steel chain slings, shackles, and d-rings controlled by individual shops
or logistics. Historically, the United Space Alliance (USA) Heavy Equipment
organization, located at KSC, conducted these load tests at its shop. The
maintenance date was indicated on a dog tag attached to each item. The
shop supervisors and technicians were responsible for ensuring the items
were tested. Hardware items whose load tests were past due could not be
used for processing and were verified through the Quality department. USA
departments were using a variety of workflow processes to accomplish the
load test and return the item to service, and little communication occurred
between organizations.
An intense 4-day process improvement team investigation was initiated
in October 2001 to analyze the process, identify problem areas, and
develop countermeasures. The team documented the process flow
used by the majority
of the organizations’ operations (figure 1), interpreted historical
data, and found the average cycle time (from request for load testing
to return of item) was 54 days with a 45-day standard deviation. Hardware
could be tested much more quickly based on a processing emergency, but
approval for expedited load testing was difficult to obtain. In response
to long out-of-use periods, shops purchased hardware in duplicate and
sometimes
triplicate. Hardware was periodically lost or misplaced during the process,
and tracking a request through the system was virtually impossible.
Though historical information was scant, the majority of items deemed
to have failed load testing did so during a visual inspection performed
before
the actual load test. The team investigated the load test requirements
in NASA-STD-8719.9 and compared them to the “KSC List of Nonload
Test Slings” in KHB 1710.2. Approval was obtained from the NASA
KSC Lifting Devices and Equipment Manager to submit requests for addition
to
the exempt list.
The process improvement team recommended a new streamlined workflow
(figure 2) and the following measures that were adopted and are
nearing final implementation:
- Each organization
will submit a list for approval to the “KSC List
of Nonload Test Slings.”
- USA Heavy Equipment
will perform annual inspections at the owner’s
location in lieu of the load test and eliminate transportation.
- An
off-the-shelf software package (MAXIMO) will automate the maintenance
recall and track the visual inspection process. MAXIMO will
initiate a work order directly to Heavy Equipment 30 days prior to
the expiration
date of each item.
- The maintenance
dog tag on the hardware will indicate the item as exempt from load
testing and will reflect a visual inspection
date (figure 3).
|
|

Figure 3. Sling and Shackle Bearing New Maintenance Dog Tags
The table depicts
performance statistics of the old process compared to the new process.
|
|
Old
Process
|
New
Process
|
Date
Range for Data
|
11/20/98
to 9/10/01
|
N/A
|
Number
of Requests per Year
|
60
|
20
|
Minimum
Cycle Time (days)
|
1
|
1
|
Maximum
Cycle Time (days)
|
196
|
1
|
Averave
Cycle Time (days)
|
54
|
1
|
Standard
Deviation (days) (High variability shows process out of
control)
|
45
|
1
|
Average
Time Equipment Out of Service (days)
|
54
|
1
|
Approximate
USA Labor Hours per Year
|
720
|
110
|
Table 1. Analysis of Old Versus New Process
Key accomplishments:
- Over 600 labor
hours will be saved per year across several organizations.
- Using the same
expiration date for all of the items in a single location streamlines
the inspection process and requires fewer inspectors.
- Onsite inspection
prevents the possibility of lost hardware and dramatically reduces
out-of-use time, thereby eliminating the need to stock excess equipment.
- Paper support
requests and load-testing documentation are eliminated.
- The process is
standardized for all organizations.
Contact: M.C. Glenn (Malcolm.Glenn-1@ksc.nasa.gov),
PH-L1, (321) 861-4128
Participating Organization: United Space Alliance (K.P. Warren [team lead],
J.R. Ewald, K.D. VanDyke, J.L. Bisbey, C. McCombs, T.L. Henderson, D.C. Smith,
G. Garrett, L.A. Tripps, M. Chavez, and P. Cureton)
|