The ability to monitor the air quality in a
closed environment, such as the Shuttle, the International Space Station
(ISS), and future human missions to Mars or the Moon, is important to ensure
health and safety of astronauts. Postmission analyses of grab air samples
from the Shuttle have confirmed the occasional presence of onboard contaminants.
Accordingly, a need exists for a lightweight, low-power, miniature instrument
that can monitor contaminants at trace levels in real time. One promising
technology is the Electronic nose (E-nose). Commercial E-nose instruments
are now available, and several are being evaluated at the Kennedy Space
Center for space program applications (figure 1).
An E-nose consists of an array of nonspecific vapor sensors. Typically,
each individual sensor responds to a broad range of chemicals, albeit
with a unique sensitivity relative to the other sensors. Upon exposure
to a
test vapor, the pattern and magnitude of response across the sensing
array is compared to previously stored response patterns. The E-nose
is selective
because individual vapors induce unique response patterns. Representative
response patterns for hypergolic fuels (i.e., hydrazine [HZ] and monomethylhydrazine
[MMH]) are presented graphically in figure 2. Although chemically similar,
the patterns for HZ and MMH are clearly distinct. The collection of
data for the E-nose library and the development of mathematical
models for
using that data for identification of a test vapor are known as “training.” A
properly trained E-nose could provide notification of sudden adverse
events, such as leaks, spills, or even fire. The program at KSC is evaluating
the
E-nose technology for monitoring organic vapors and other chemicals in
breathing air.
One critical parameter for space applications is the detection and
identification of hypergolic fuel. Present allowable vapor levels
in breathing air are
set at 10 parts per billion (ppb). One particularly challenging application
is the detection of hypergols in the Shuttle airlock at these levels.
During space walks, the Orbital Maneuvering System is controlled
by a Hypergolic
Propulsion System. Prior to reentry to the crew quarters cabin through
the airlock, it is important to verify that no residual vapor is
present. This must be done at the operating pressures of the
airlock, which
range from about 3 to 15 pounds per square inch (psi). Although numerous
monitors
exist for hypergolic fuel vapors at higher concentrations, few technologies
have been identified that reliably respond at this low concentration.
Thus far, the Kamina is the only commercial E-nose technology that
can readily
respond to hypergolic fuels at this level (figure 3).
To train the Kamina E-nose to hypergolic fuels, over 50 individual
exposures were performed at pressures ranging from 3 to 14.5 psi
and relative humidity
ranging from 5 to 80 percent for concentrations in the 10- to 1,000-ppb
range. Using the vendor-supplied modeling software to perform a
principal component analysis (PCA) followed by linear discrimination
analysis
(LDA), a model was created that assigned individual compounds to
well-defined regions in two-dimensional space. This demonstrates
that the Kamina
should
identify these vapors. In addition to developing models using vendor-supplied
software, there is an active in-house program to develop algorithms
to identify which sensor elements within the array provide the
most information,
to identify the best procedure to extract information from the
data, and to determine the best classifier for the application.
Key accomplishments:
- Evaluated four commercial
E-nose technologies for low-level detection of hypergolic fuels and
identified at least one instrument (Kamina)
that can readily detect HZ and MMH at 10 ppb.
- Using the Kamina
E-nose, collected a training set composed of over 50
independent hypergolic fuel (HZ and MMH) measurements at concentrations
ranging from
10 to 1,000 ppb. The effects of ambient relative humidity
(5 to 85 percent) and pressure (3 to 15 psi) were included in the training
set.
- Developed
criteria to extract analytically significant information (e.g.,
features) from the training set to develop models with improved
identification efficiencies. Using the newly developed feature extraction method,
self-validation
of the training set predicts an improved probability of identification
near 90 percent.
- Obtained comparable
identification efficiencies with a second training set composed of
five common volatile organic compounds.
- Demonstrated
that both short-term and long-term exposures provide similar identification
information.
|
|

Figure 1. Various E-Nose Instrumentation Currently Being Evaluated by
KSC for Space Applications
(Instruments include the Kamina [Forschungzentrum Karlsruhe, Germany],
the Sam Detect [DaimlerChrysler, Aerospace, Germany], the Cyranose 320
[Cyrano Scientific, USA], and the I-Pen [AirSense, Germany].)

Figure 2. Response
of the Sensor Array Used in the Kamina E-Nose
to HZ and MMH
(Unique response patterns obtained for200-ppb HZ and
200-ppb MMH.)

Figure 3. Real-Time Response of the Kamina Sensor Array to
10-ppb HZ
and MMH
(The array was exposed with clean air for approximately 60 seconds followed
by exposure to the HZ or MMH vapor. The average of the 38 sensors is
plotted as R/Ro, where R is the sensor response at any point in time
and Ro is the response of the sensor in clean air.)
Contact:
R.C. Young (Rebecca.Young-1@ksc-nasa.gov),
YA-C3, (321) 867-8765
Participating Organization: Dynacs Inc. (Dr. W.J. Buttner and Dr. B.R. Linnell)
|