Everything that is shipped into space is likely
to become waste of one kind or another. This project looked at waste processing
options and their impact on life support. About 40,300 kilograms (kg) of
life support commodities are required for a crew of six for a year (yr).
This is a lot of mass to supply and generates a similar mass of waste to
be disposed of. Fortunately, much of this waste mass is recoverable, though
at a cost of requiring some additional resources to process the waste.
One example of a recoverable resource is water. Water is resupplied to
the International Space Station (ISS) at a rate of approximately 3,500
kg/yr in its current configuration.
This project developed a model that calculated system impacts for
varying mission types. System impacts are estimated in mass units
as equivalent
system mass (ESM). Estimates of initial and time-dependent ESM and
break-even times for different life support options are shown
in table 1 for a Mars
surface mission with a crew of six people. The picture is less clear
for ISS itself, in low Earth orbit, because much of the water
is supplied from
the Shuttle fuel cells and would otherwise be dumped.
Using ALS technologies, the time-dependent mass would be about 18,800
kg/yr. About 16,700 kg/yr of this would appear as waste that would
have to be
dealt with during the mission. This waste would be of a variety of
types, including expended (ORU’s), gases (notably carbon dioxide [CO2]),
liquids (waste hygiene water, urine), and solids (trash, feces).
Our models and resulting analyses were used to produce the official
ALS Research and Technology Development (R&TD) Metric (Drysdale and Hanford,
2002, JSC 47787, and earlier revisions) released by NASA Johnson Space
Center (JSC). The metric used is calculated by dividing the ESM for a
specified mission using ISS technology (ESMISS) by the ESM for the same
mission using
ALS technology (ESMALS): metric = ESMISS / ESMALS. The values of the
metric for the missions considered are given in table 2.
|
|
For
some mission scenarios, inedible biomass is a significant issue. A
biomass production estimate was developed with Dr. Raymond Wheeler,
YA-E4, for biomass and waste production for each of the selected ALS
crop plants. From this crop model and the design of the plant production
system for the BIO-Plex (Barta, 1996), the cost effectiveness of each
of the crop plants was calculated. Using the diets given in the Baseline
Values and Assumptions Document (BVAD), excluding those crop plants
that were shown to be not cost-effective and using crop production
rates from the BVAD, a plant waste data model for a crew of six was
developed. The food closures (dry-weight basis) for the missions considered
were calculated to be: Mars transit, 13 percent; Mars surface exploration
mission, 13 percent; and a Mars base, 29 percent.
The
waste model (draft for Mars missions) is summarized in table 3. The
missions are further defined in Stafford, Levri, and Drysdale (2001),
the ALS SIMA Reference Missions Document, JSC 39502.
Key accomplishments:
- Numerous publications
and reports identifying model results were generated and presented
(publication list available upon request).
- Plant waste models
for ISS missions and Mars missions were calculated.
Key milestones:
- Results of this
work are being presented at international conferences, including
the International Conference on Environmental Systems (San Antonio,
July 2002) and the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) conference
(Houston, August 2002).
Contact: Dr. R.M. Wheeler (Raymond.Wheeler-1@ksc-nasa.gov),
YA-E4, (321) 476-4273
Participating Organization: Boeing (A.E. Drysdale and S. Maxwell)
|
Option |
Initial
ESM (kg) |
Time-Dependent
ESM (kg/yr)
|
Break-Even
Time (yr)
Compared to Open Loop
|
Open
Loop |
8,000 |
40,300 |
|
ISS
Technology |
9,910 |
25,600 |
0.12 |
Advanced
Life Support
(ALS) Technology
|
11,000 |
18,800 |
0.16 |
Table 1. Initial and Time-Dependent ESM and Break-Even Times
Mission/Vehicle
|
ISS
Technology
ESM (kg)
|
ALS
Technology
ESM (kg)
|
ALS
R&TD Metric
|
ISS
Upgrade
|
122,513
|
92,866
|
1.32
|
Independent
Exploration Mission
|
92,648
|
72,210
|
1.28
|
Mars
Transit
|
27,966
|
20,711
|
1.35
|
Descent/Ascent
Lander
|
12,721
|
9,122
|
1.39
|
Surface
Habitat
|
51,961
|
42,377
|
1.23
|
Table 2. ALS Project Mission Metrics
ALS
Subsystem
or Interface
|
Mars
Transit
ALS
|
Mars
Descent/
Ascent Lander
|
Dual
Lander Mars
Surface ALS
|
Mars
Base
|
|
Mass
(kg)
|
Volume
(m3)
|
Mass
(kg)
|
Volume
(m3)
|
Mass
(kg)
|
Volume
(m3)
|
Mass
(kg)
|
Volume
(m3)
|
Air |
7.50
|
0.57
|
0.37
|
0.00
|
6.07
|
0.01
|
0.37
|
0.00
|
Biomass |
0.61
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
1.19
|
0.00
|
1.41
|
0.00
|
Food |
4.46
|
0.01
|
4.95
|
0.01
|
3.71
|
0.01
|
77.87
|
0.09
|
Thermal |
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Waste |
2.29
|
0.00
|
5.77
|
0.01
|
3.64
|
0.01
|
2.29
|
0.00 |
Water |
0.98
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
0.00
|
Crew |
35.31
|
0.03
|
30.32
|
0.03
|
35.31 |
0.03
|
35.31
|
0.03
|
EVA |
0.00 |
0.00
|
12.71
|
0.03
|
7.26
|
0.03
|
7.26
|
0.03
|
Human
Accommondations |
52.60
|
0.07
|
12.71
|
0.03
|
52.60
|
0.07
|
52.60
|
0.07
|
TOTAL |
103.75
|
0.69
|
66.84
|
0.12
|
109.79
|
0.16
|
177.10
|
0.03
|
Table 3. ALS Waste Model for Mars Missions
|